Contradictions and Paradoxes in 1 Chronicles 11:19

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 1 Chronicles 11:19 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 1 Chronicles 11:19. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of 1 Chronicles, the speaker is saying that he couldn't drink the special water because it was too important; the men risked their lives to get it for him, so it was like their blood, and that was too precious to waste. He wanted to honor the bravery of these three strongest men by saving the water instead.

1 Chronicles 11:19: And said, My God forbid it me, that I should do this thing: shall I drink the blood of these men that have put their lives in jeopardy? for with [the jeopardy of] their lives they brought it. Therefore he would not drink it. These things did these three mightiest. [that have...: Heb. with their lives?]

Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5

While 1 Chronicles 11:19 emphasizes loyalty and devotion towards God by not drinking the water, Proverbs 3:5 advocates for trusting in the Lord and not relying on one's own understanding, implying that personal judgment might be less reliable than divine instruction.

Proverbs 3:5: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.

Contradiction with Matthew 15:11

1 Chronicles 11:19 speaks of potentially defiling oneself by drinking the water, while Matthew 15:11 states that it is not what enters the mouth that defiles a person, but rather what comes out of it.

Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.

Contradiction with Romans 14:14

The notion in 1 Chronicles 11:19 that drinking could be improper is contradicted by Romans 14:14, which declares that nothing is unclean in itself, challenging the idea of inherent defilement from the act.

Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]

Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19

1 Chronicles 11:19 avoids consuming the water as a pure act, whereas Mark 7:18-19 reinforces that all foods are clean and what enters does not defile a man, focusing on spiritual rather than physical purity.

Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?

Paradox #1

The potential contradiction in 1 Chronicles 11:19 could be seen in how it portrays the reverence for life and the sacredness of actions dedicated to God. The verse suggests that an act viewed as dishonorable or risky by some could be considered sacred by others. This might seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible where the sanctity of life and deliberate harm or risk-taking are more clearly condemned. Such tensions in interpretation could arise from differing views on what actions are considered truly honoring to God.

Paradox #2

This verse might raise questions about its moral or ethical implications. Some people might see a contradiction between the respect for human life and the act of pouring out water, seen as symbolic of risking soldiers' lives. It could be perceived as inconsiderate towards the efforts and risks taken by the soldiers. This may not align with modern views on leadership and responsibility.

Paradox #3

The moral inconsistency in this verse could be seen in the act of refusing a gift that required a sacrifice or risk from others. It might seem like rejecting their effort or bravery, which could be seen as discouraging or disrespectful to those who acted to provide the gift.

Paradox #4

The numerical inconsistency in 1 Chronicles 11:19 arises when comparing the account with the related story in 2 Samuel 23:17. Both passages describe David refraining from drinking water that his warriors brought him, saying it was like drinking the blood of men who risked their lives. The inconsistency lies primarily in surrounding details of these parallel accounts, not directly in the numbers but more in the narrative elements around the event, which sometimes are interpreted differently between the two sources.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.