Contradiction with 2 Samuel 3:1
This verse depicts the house of Saul growing weaker, which could contradict the support mentioned from Saul's kindred in 1 Chronicles 12:29.
2 Samuel 3:1: Now there was long war between the house of Saul and the house of David: but David waxed stronger and stronger, and the house of Saul waxed weaker and weaker.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 13:14
This verse states that the kingdom has been taken from Saul, suggesting instability and reduced support, in contrast to 1 Chronicles 12:29.
1 Samuel 13:14: But now thy kingdom shall not continue: the LORD hath sought him a man after his own heart, and the LORD hath commanded him [to be] captain over his people, because thou hast not kept [that] which the LORD commanded thee.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:28
The verse indicates that the kingdom was torn from Saul, conflicting with the idea of support from Saul's own kin in 1 Chronicles 12:29.
1 Samuel 15:28: And Samuel said unto him, The LORD hath rent the kingdom of Israel from thee this day, and hath given it to a neighbour of thine, [that is] better than thou.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 28:17
Here, the prophecy of Saul's downfall is presented, contradicting the notion of Saul's support shown in 1 Chronicles 12:29.
1 Samuel 28:17: And the LORD hath done to him, as he spake by me: for the LORD hath rent the kingdom out of thine hand, and given it to thy neighbour, [even] to David: [to him: or, for himself] [me: Heb. mine hand]
Contradiction with 2 Samuel 5:1-3
These verses describe the unified support for David as king, which could contradict any substantial allegiance to Saul's house as suggested in 1 Chronicles 12:29.
2 Samuel 5:1-3: Then came all the tribes of Israel to David unto Hebron, and spake, saying, Behold, we [are] thy bone and thy flesh.