Contradiction with James 1:20
For the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God, while 1 Chronicles 13:11 shows David angry for what is presented as a divine action.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
It suggests leaving vengeance to God, yet 1 Chronicles 13:11 shows displeasure towards a divine act of judgment.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:3
This verse makes a note on human anger leading to mistakes, whereas David's anger in 1 Chronicles 13:11 arises from God’s decision.
Proverbs 19:3: The foolishness of man perverteth his way: and his heart fretteth against the LORD.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in 1 Chronicles 13:11 could arise from the perception of unfairness in God's anger. Uzzah is punished for touching the Ark of the Covenant, an act that seems well-intentioned as he tries to prevent it from falling. This might seem inconsistent with the notion of a just and compassionate God because Uzzah's intentions may have been to protect a holy object, yet he faces severe consequences.