Contradiction with 1 Kings 9:20-21
Describes how Solomon did not put the remaining Canaanites to the sword, but instead made them bondservants, contrasting with the killing portrayed in 1 Chronicles 20:3.
1 Kings 9:20-21: [And] all the people [that were] left of the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, which [were] not of the children of Israel,
Contradiction with 2 Samuel 12:31
Records a similar event but with differences in details of what was done to the inhabitants, providing a different account than that in 1 Chronicles 20:3.
2 Samuel 12:31: And he brought forth the people that [were] therein, and put [them] under saws, and under harrows of iron, and under axes of iron, and made them pass through the brickkiln: and thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon. So David and all the people returned unto Jerusalem.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
Speaks of beating swords into plowshares and not learning war anymore, which contrasts with the violence described in 1 Chronicles 20:3.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Instructs to love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, which is contrary to the violent treatment in 1 Chronicles 20:3.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Paradox #1
1 Chronicles 20:3 could be seen as inconsistent when compared to other biblical teachings on justice, mercy, and the treatment of captives. Some people might find that the actions described in this verse conflict with ideals of compassion and forgiveness found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in 1 Chronicles 20:3 could be related to differing views on the morality of certain actions described there compared to other Biblical teachings on mercy and justice. Some people might see conflict between this verse and other parts of the Bible that emphasize kindness and forgiveness.
Paradox #3
1 Chronicles 20:3 has a contradiction when compared to 2 Samuel 12:31. Both verses describe similar events, but they differ in details about how David treated the people of the captured cities. The Chronicles account suggests a harsher treatment, which may conflict with the account in Samuel. This inconsistency raises questions about which version is more historically accurate.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse is the depiction of violent and harsh treatment of captives from war, which goes against teachings elsewhere in the Bible that emphasize love, compassion, and forgiveness. This creates a conflict between actions described in certain narratives and broader ethical teachings in the scripture.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or inconsistency could involve differences in how this verse is translated or interpreted across various versions of the Bible, especially concerning the numbers or actions described. Some translations may differ in details, which could lead to confusion or perceived conflicts in the message or numerical details presented.