Contradiction with 1 Samuel 24:1
In 1 Samuel 24:1, David is seen sparing Saul’s life, emphasizing mercy, while 1 Chronicles 21:12 involves God sending punishment.
1 Samuel 24:1: And it came to pass, when Saul was returned from following the Philistines, that it was told him, saying, Behold, David [is] in the wilderness of Engedi. [following: Heb. after]
Contradiction with James 1:13
James 1:13 states God does not tempt with evil, contradicting the idea of God offering punishment as a choice.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:23
Ezekiel 18:23 suggests God has no pleasure in the death of the wicked, conflicting with the choice of a deadly pestilence in 1 Chronicles 21:12.
Ezekiel 18:23: Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: [and] not that he should return from his ways, and live?
Contradiction with Matthew 5:7
Matthew 5:7 celebrates mercy, whereas 1 Chronicles 21:12 outlines a punitive option.
Matthew 5:7: Blessed [are] the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
1 John 4:8 proclaims God is love, clashing with God presenting an option for severe punishment.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Paradox #1
The contradiction related to this verse involves different accounts of the same event in the Bible. In 1 Chronicles 21:12, it mentions one option of punishment as three years of famine. However, in 2 Samuel 24:13, which describes a similar event, the duration of the famine is given as seven years. This difference in the length of the famine is seen as a contradiction between the two accounts.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in this verse is the idea of God giving a severe punishment despite being merciful and loving. It presents a situation where people are punished harshly because of a leader's error, which seems inconsistent with the concept of justice as it involves innocent people suffering for someone else's mistake. This conflict raises questions about fairness and compassion.