Contradiction with 2 Samuel 24:1
This verse states that God's anger was kindled against Israel and He moved David to number Israel, whereas 1 Chronicles 21:2 says Satan provoked David to carry out the census.
2 Samuel 24:1: And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.
Paradox #1
The contradiction arises when comparing 1 Chronicles 21:2 with 2 Samuel 24:1. In 1 Chronicles, it is Satan who incites David to take a census, while in 2 Samuel, it is God who incites David. This creates a conflict about who is responsible for prompting David's action.
Paradox #2
The verse in question relates to King David conducting a census of Israel. The contradiction or inconsistency arises because, in other parts of the Bible, specifically in the book of Exodus (Exodus 30:12), it suggests that taking a census without God's command is not right and could bring consequences. Therefore, the issue is between the idea of human leadership doing something independently versus following divine instructions.
Paradox #3
1 Chronicles 21:2 has a potential contradiction with a similar account in 2 Samuel 24:1-2. In 1 Chronicles, it says that Satan incited David to count the people of Israel, while in 2 Samuel, it suggests that it was the anger of the Lord that led to this action. This difference in who incited David could be seen as an inconsistency between the two accounts.
Paradox #4
This verse could be seen as a contradiction because earlier texts suggest that taking a census can demonstrate a lack of trust in God's ability to provide and protect, reflecting a reliance on military strength or human resources instead of divine support. Thus, David ordering a census might be viewed as conflicting with faith in God's provision.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or inconsistency related to 1 Chronicles 21:2 arises when comparing it with 2 Samuel 24:1-9. In both accounts, King David orders a census of Israel, but the reported numbers of the people differ between the two passages. This discrepancy in the census figures between the two accounts is the source of the numerical inconsistency.