Contradiction with Genesis 38:29
1 Chronicles 2:3 refers to Er as the firstborn of Judah, whereas Genesis 38:29 indicates that Pharez (who was not the firstborn) continued Judah's lineage, suggesting a primacy shift to the younger sibling.
Genesis 38:29: And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? [this] breach [be] upon thee: therefore his name was called Pharez. [How hast...: or, Wherefore hast thou made this breach against thee?] [Pharez: that is A breach]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 25:5-6
1 Chronicles 2:3 mentions that Er was wicked in God's sight, whereas Deuteronomy 25:5-6 discusses the importance of preserving a brother’s lineage, suggesting a cultural and legal significance that contradicts the rejection of Er.
Deuteronomy 25:5-6: If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husband's brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband's brother unto her. [her husband's...: or, her next kinsman]
Paradox #1
This verse mentions Er, the firstborn of Judah, being wicked in the Lord's sight, and his death as a consequence. The contradiction arises when comparing this account with Genesis 38, where Er is similarly described. However, the inconsistency is in the broader genealogy and details around Judah's family in different parts of the Bible, which sometimes vary in names, order, or detail, causing confusion among scholars and readers about reconciling these accounts.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency in this context could be regarding the punishment for wrongdoing. The verse briefly mentions an event related to someone's death without providing details or explanation about the fairness or justice of the punishment involved. Observers might question if the punishment fittingly matches the wrongdoing or if there is a deeper moral lesson that is not explicitly stated. This can lead to various interpretations about justice and moral accountability.