Contradiction with 1 Chronicles 2:49
This verse describes the family lineage and can seemingly contradict the lineage details outlined in 1 Chronicles 2:52 through different interpretations of named descendants.
1 Chronicles 2:49: She bare also Shaaph the father of Madmannah, Sheva the father of Machbenah, and the father of Gibea: and the daughter of Caleb [was] Achsah.
Contradiction with Genesis 36:12
The lineage of Esau here can be seen as contradicting 1 Chronicles 2:52 when considering the broader familial relations and ancestor details with variant translations or interpretations.
Genesis 36:12: And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz Esau's son; and she bare to Eliphaz Amalek: these [were] the sons of Adah Esau's wife.
Contradiction with Ruth 4:17
The genealogy here presents a different ancestral context, which could contradict the lineage specifics of 1 Chronicles 2:52 through varying interpretive perspectives.
Ruth 4:17: And the women her neighbours gave it a name, saying, There is a son born to Naomi; and they called his name Obed: he [is] the father of Jesse, the father of David.
Contradiction with Matthew 1:3
This genealogy presents figures that, depending on interpretation, could contradict or provide different lineage insights compared to 1 Chronicles 2:52.
Matthew 1:3: And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;
Contradiction with Numbers 26:21
The genealogical records in this verse might be contrasted with 1 Chronicles 2:52, revealing discrepancies through the interpretations of tribal associations and descendant listings.
Numbers 26:21: And the sons of Pharez were; of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Hamul, the family of the Hamulites.