Contradiction with Romans 14:14
This verse suggests that nothing is unclean in itself, contrasting with the idea of being mindful of the benefit to others.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Philippians 3:13
Focuses on forgetting past actions and striving forward, which may oppose setting limits for the sake of others.
Philippians 3:13: Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but [this] one thing [I do], forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 1:14
Expresses the idea that earthly endeavors and activities are vanity, challenging the premise that all things are lawful and constructive.
Ecclesiastes 1:14: I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all [is] vanity and vexation of spirit.
Contradiction with Mark 7:15
Suggests that nothing from outside a person can defile them, contrasting with the mindfulness in lawful actions in 1 Corinthians 10:23.
Mark 7:15: If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:13
Warns against using freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, which contrasts with the permissive "all things are lawful" claim.
Galatians 5:13: For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only [use] not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:12
Earlier states that all things are lawful but not all are beneficial, hinting at potential contradiction with excessive freedom.
1 Corinthians 6:12: All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. [expedient: or, profitable]
Contradiction with James 1:14
Discusses how temptation stems from personal desire, potentially contradicting the idea that all permissible acts are beneficial.
James 1:14: But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in this verse could be the tension between personal freedom and the responsibility to consider the impact of one's actions on others. While it suggests that actions may be permissible, they might not be beneficial or constructive for everyone. This could conflict with other teachings that emphasize the need to prioritize community welfare and moral responsibility over individual liberty.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction with this verse could relate to balancing personal freedom with the impact of our actions on others. While it suggests that many things are allowed, it also hints that not everything is beneficial or constructive for the community. The challenge is how to exercise freedom without negatively affecting others, which might conflict with guidance found in other parts of the Bible that emphasize community well-being.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency could be that the verse suggests all actions are permissible, but not all are beneficial or constructive. This could be seen as conflicting because it implies freedom to act, yet advises considering the consequences and impact on others, which may limit that freedom. This can create confusion about what is truly permissible or right.