Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse states there is neither male nor female, for all are one in Christ Jesus, suggesting no distinct roles as implied in 1 Corinthians 11:11.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Ephesians 5:22
This verse instructs wives to submit to their husbands, which seems to contradict the mutual dependency described in 1 Corinthians 11:11.
Ephesians 5:22: Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:7
This verse describes husbands as being in a position of honor and understanding towards their wives, potentially contradicting the equality suggested in 1 Corinthians 11:11.
1 Peter 3:7: Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with [them] according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:12-14
This passage restricts women's roles in teaching and authority over men, contrasting the interdependent equality described in 1 Corinthians 11:11.
1 Timothy 2:12-14: But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
Contradiction with Genesis 3:16
This verse places men in a ruling position over women, contradicting the idea of mutual dependence in 1 Corinthians 11:11.
Genesis 3:16: Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. [to thy...: or, subject to thy husband]
Paradox #1
1 Corinthians 11:11 talks about the mutual dependence of men and women. A contradiction or inconsistency might arise when comparing this verse with other biblical passages that emphasize male authority over women. This could create a conflict in understanding the role and equality of men and women within Christian teachings. Different interpretations over time have led to debates regarding gender roles in religious and social contexts.
Paradox #2
This verse emphasizes the interdependence of men and women. A potential moral inconsistency arises when compared to other parts of the Bible that may promote male dominance or hierarchy. This verse suggests equality, contrasting with verses that might imply a different balance of gender roles.