Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:33
Emphasizes God as a God of peace, suggesting unity rather than contentious practices, which could seem to contradict the notion of having no custom of contentious behavior as discussed in 1 Corinthians 11:16.
1 Corinthians 14:33: For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. [confusion: Gr. tumult, or, unquietness]
Contradiction with Romans 14:19
Encourages the pursuit of peace and edification, which could be seen as conflicting with the acceptance of contentious behavior implied by 1 Corinthians 11:16.
Romans 14:19: Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.
Paradox #1
1 Corinthians 11:16 may seem to contradict the idea of Christian liberty and grace found in other parts of the New Testament, where the emphasis is on inner faith rather than external practices or customs. This could be seen as inconsistent with the teaching that believers are not bound by strict adherence to specific traditions or rituals.
Paradox #2
The verse could be seen as having a contradiction or inconsistency with earlier instructions in the same passage where specific practices are emphasized. The verse suggests that contention over these practices is unnecessary, which could appear to conflict with the importance previously placed on them.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency related to 1 Corinthians 11:16 could be seen in the way early Christian communities had differing practices and beliefs. Some groups might have had varying opinions or customs about the cultural practices being discussed, leading to disagreements or inconsistencies in how they interpreted and followed these teachings.
Paradox #4
This verse suggests conformity to certain traditions. The possible contradiction is that while Christianity often promotes internal spiritual values and personal relationship with God, this verse might emphasize external customs or traditions. This can conflict with the idea of individual freedom and personal interpretation over rigid adherence to tradition.