Contradiction with Matthew 6:7
This verse contradicts 1 Corinthians 14:14 by emphasizing the avoidance of vain repetitions in prayer, suggesting that prayer should be understood, not in an unknown tongue.
Matthew 6:7: But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen [do]: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:19
This verse contradicts 1 Corinthians 14:14 by prioritizing understanding over speaking in tongues, stating that it is better to speak few words that are understood than many in an unknown tongue.
1 Corinthians 14:19: Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that [by my voice] I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an [unknown] tongue.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:5
This verse contradicts 1 Corinthians 14:14 by emphasizing the need for interpretation when speaking in tongues, suggesting the importance of understanding for edification in the church.
1 Corinthians 14:5: I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater [is] he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:28
This verse contradicts 1 Corinthians 14:14 by instructing those who speak in tongues to remain silent in the church if there is no interpreter, emphasizing the importance of intelligibility in corporate worship.
1 Corinthians 14:28: But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.
Paradox #1
Some people see a contradiction with this verse and the idea that prayer should involve understanding and comprehension. If praying in an unknown language doesn't involve the mind, some might wonder if it fits with teachings that emphasize meaningful communication with God. However, others argue that this kind of prayer reflects a different, equally valid spiritual experience.
Paradox #2
1 Corinthians 14:14 could raise questions about understanding and clarity in communication, as it discusses praying in a way that the mind might not understand. This could seem inconsistent with the idea that prayer and worship should be comprehensible to edify oneself and others.
Paradox #3
Some people might see a contradiction in how speaking in tongues could be considered a spiritual gift, yet it is described as not understood by the speaker's own mind. This could be seen as inconsistent with the idea that spiritual gifts should be beneficial and understandable to both the speaker and the listeners.