Contradiction with Matthew 5:25
This verse advises settling disputes quickly, even with adversaries, which contrasts with taking disputes before the saints as suggested in 1 Corinthians 6:1.
Matthew 5:25: Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
Contradiction with Matthew 18:15-17
These verses outline a process for resolving disputes within the church that involves private discussion before involving the church, whereas 1 Corinthians 6:1 suggests taking disputes directly to the saints.
Matthew 18:15-17: Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:9-10
Advises resolving matters privately and not publicly, which conflicts with the idea of bringing disputes before the church community as in 1 Corinthians 6:1.
Proverbs 25:9-10: Debate thy cause with thy neighbour [himself]; and discover not a secret to another: [a secret...: or, the secret of]
Contradiction with James 5:9
Encourages believers not to grumble against one another, contrasting with the need to bring grievances before others as in 1 Corinthians 6:1.
James 5:9: Grudge not one against another, brethren, lest ye be condemned: behold, the judge standeth before the door. [Grudge not: or, Groan, or, Grieve not]
Contradiction with Luke 17:3-4
Encourages personal forgiveness over public dispute resolution, which can contradict the practice of involving others as suggested in 1 Corinthians 6:1.
Luke 17:3-4: Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 4:8
Emphasizes love covering sins, which may negate the need for public arbitration as in 1 Corinthians 6:1.
1 Peter 4:8: And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall cover the multitude of sins. [shall: or, will]
Contradiction with Romans 12:17-19
Instructs believers to avoid repaying evil for evil and live peaceably with all, which stands in conflict with the idea of presenting grievances as advocated in 1 Corinthians 6:1.
Romans 12:17-19: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction or conflict here may involve the idea of addressing disputes within the Christian community. While 1 Corinthians 6:1 advises settling disputes among believers within the church rather than using secular courts, other parts of the Bible emphasize obedience to governmental authority and laws. This could lead to confusion about when it is appropriate to use legal systems or rely solely on church mediation for resolving conflicts.
Paradox #2
1 Corinthians 6:1 suggests that conflicts between believers should not be taken to secular courts but resolved within the church community. A possible contradiction might be that the legal system is designed to provide fair and impartial justice, so excluding it could deny proper legal recourse. Additionally, resolving disputes only within a church could lead to biased outcomes if church leaders favor one party over another.