Contradiction with James 2:9
This verse emphasizes that showing partiality or favoritism is against God's teachings, whereas 1 Corinthians 7:17 implies that God has called individuals to different life situations, which could be seen as partiality in roles or statuses.
James 2:9: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse states that there is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor female in Christ, suggesting equality in roles and status, which contradicts the idea in 1 Corinthians 7:17 of abiding in the role or calling assigned by God.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Romans 12:4-5
This passage discusses the unity and equality of the body of Christ with its many members, which can seem at odds with 1 Corinthians 7:17's instruction to remain in distinct callings and roles.
Romans 12:4-5: For as we have many members in one body, and all members have not the same office:
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
These verses emphasize that God shows no favoritism and accepts those from any nation who fear Him, contradicting the idea that God specifically assigns different callings and roles in 1 Corinthians 7:17.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Colossians 3:11
This verse echoes the sentiment that there is no distinction between people in Christ, contrasting with the idea in 1 Corinthians 7:17 of different callings according to individual circumstances.
Colossians 3:11: Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond [nor] free: but Christ [is] all, and in all.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in 1 Corinthians 7:17 could be the tension between individual freedom and conforming to one's social or cultural circumstances. The verse suggests that people should remain in the situation they were in when God called them. This might seem inconsistent with the idea of personal growth, change, or improvement if one's current situation is unjust or limiting. It highlights the conflict between accepting one's life as it is versus striving for change.