Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse suggests that all distinctions and social statuses are abolished in Christ, conflicting with staying in one's calling.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Colossians 3:11
Similar to Galatians 3:28, it emphasizes the removal of racial, social, and economic barriers in Christ.
Colossians 3:11: Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond [nor] free: but Christ [is] all, and in all.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 12:13
It emphasizes unity and equality within the body of Christ, challenging the idea of remaining in the same status.
1 Corinthians 12:13: For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether [we be] Jews or Gentiles, whether [we be] bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. [Gentiles: Gr. Greeks]
Contradiction with James 2:1-4
Encourages impartiality in treatment irrespective of one's social status, indirectly suggesting changes in societal roles.
James 2:1-4: My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory, with respect of persons.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
Peter's realization that God does not show favoritism challenges remaining in a fixed status.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14-15
Talks about unifying different groups into one, which could imply changes in social roles.
Ephesians 2:14-15: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Paradox #1
The verse could be seen as contradictory if compared to other biblical teachings that promote equality and freedom in Christ. Some might view it as inconsistent with the idea of transformation and new life, which suggests that social or earthly statuses should not hold spiritual significance. However, these perceived contradictions often arise from different interpretations of the verse's context and purpose.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction with the idea of freedom in Christianity. The verse suggests staying in the situation you were in when you became a believer. This could conflict with the belief that faith in Jesus brings new freedom and change. Some might wonder why they should stay in their old situation if their faith makes them new and free.
Paradox #3
One potential contradiction could be that this verse suggests people should remain in whatever situation or social status they were in when they became believers. This might conflict with the idea of personal improvement or change, especially if their situation is unjust or oppressive. It could be seen as discouraging efforts to change one's circumstances.