Contradiction with Ephesians 5:31
This verse emphasizes the union of marriage, whereas 1 Corinthians 7:36 discusses considerations for remaining unmarried.
Ephesians 5:31: For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 5:14
This verse advises younger women to marry and bear children, which contrasts with 1 Corinthians 7:36's implication of remaining single if not necessary to marry.
1 Timothy 5:14: I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully. [to speak...: Gr. for their railing]
Contradiction with Genesis 2:24
Marriage is established as a divine institution in this verse, which counters the individual discretion highlighted in 1 Corinthians 7:36.
Genesis 2:24: Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:4
This verse states marriage is honorable in all, which can conflict with the notion of remaining unmarried mentioned in 1 Corinthians 7:36.
Hebrews 13:4: Marriage [is] honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.
Contradiction with Matthew 19:5-6
These verses endorse the permanence and sanctity of marriage, which can be seen as a contrast to choosing against it, as implied in 1 Corinthians 7:36.
Matthew 19:5-6: And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Paradox #1
Some people see a conflict with 1 Corinthians 7:36 regarding interpretations about marriage and sexual relationships. Different translations offer varying views on whether the verse is about a man and his virgin daughter or a man and his betrothed partner. This can lead to confusion about the intended guidance on marriage and relationships, creating potential inconsistency in understanding biblical teachings on these matters.
Paradox #2
1 Corinthians 7:36 might be seen as inconsistent in its guidance about marriage and engagement. Some interpretations suggest it discusses treating an unmarried woman properly if a man feels he is not acting appropriately towards her when she is mature enough for marriage. The potential contradiction lies in understanding whether the verse addresses a man's actions towards his fiancée or his daughter, as translations and interpretations vary. This can lead to confusion about its application in terms of relationships and moral obligations.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency with "1 Corinthians 7:36" sometimes arises from different interpretations of what "his virgin" refers to. Some think it means a man's fiancée or daughter, leading to confusion about whether it discusses marriage for a couple or a father deciding about his daughter’s marriage. The original Greek language makes it hard to be sure, leading to different translations and understandings over time.
Paradox #4
This verse might be seen as morally conflicting because it discusses a situation where it seems to condone behavior that could raise ethical questions about consent and autonomy in relationships. It could be viewed as inconsistent with modern views on personal agency and the importance of mutual decision-making in intimate matters.