Contradiction with Romans 14:13
This verse advises not to put a stumbling block in a brother’s way, while 1 Corinthians 8:10 suggests an action that leads others to potentially stumble in faith by watching someone with knowledge eat in an idol’s temple.
Romans 14:13: Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in [his] brother's way.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 10:28
This verse instructs to refrain from eating meat if informed it's offered to idols, contrasting with 1 Corinthians 8:10 that implies eating in an idol’s temple without concern for others’ perceptions.
1 Corinthians 10:28: But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols, eat not for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake: for the earth [is] the Lord's, and the fulness thereof:
Contradiction with Revelation 2:14
Condemns eating food sacrificed to idols as an act leading to idolatry, which contradicts 1 Corinthians 8:10 that implies a knowledgeable person might eat in an idol’s temple.
Revelation 2:14: But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.
Contradiction with Acts 15:29
Advises abstaining from food offered to idols, whereas 1 Corinthians 8:10 deals with the act of eating in an idol’s temple, potentially disregarding this earlier directive.
Acts 15:29: That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:12
Although permissible, not everything is beneficial, and not everything edifies, contrasting with the implication in 1 Corinthians 8:10 that eating in an idol's temple is acceptable by those with knowledge.
1 Corinthians 6:12: All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. [expedient: or, profitable]
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction or conflict with 1 Corinthians 8:10 could relate to the idea of knowledge versus love in guiding actions. Some might see a contradiction between having the freedom to do something based on knowledge and needing to act out of love and consider the impact on others who might not have the same understanding. This could create a tension between exercising personal freedom and maintaining responsibility for the well-being of others.
Paradox #2
1 Corinthians 8:10 might have contradictions or conflicts related to early Christian practices and beliefs about eating food offered to idols. In early Christianity, some believers thought it was okay to eat such food, while others believed it was wrong. This difference in beliefs could cause conflict within the early Christian community about following religious laws and traditions.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in 1 Corinthians 8:10 could be the balance between individual freedom and community responsibility. It suggests that even if someone feels free to act in a certain way (like eating certain foods), they should consider how their actions might affect others who might not have the same understanding. The conflict arises between exercising personal liberty and the potential negative influence it might have on others' beliefs or actions.