Contradiction with 2 Thessalonians 3:10
This verse states that if any would not work, neither should they eat, which contradicts with the idea of providing for those who preach the gospel without them needing to work for it directly.
2 Thessalonians 3:10: For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:25-26
These verses emphasize not worrying about food and trust in God's provision, which contradicts the principle of earning sustenance through labor as suggested in 1 Corinthians 9:10.
Matthew 6:25-26: Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 5:18
This verse states that the laborer is worthy of his reward, which may contradict the idea of provision without repayment of effort or specific labor.
1 Timothy 5:18: For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer [is] worthy of his reward.
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in 1 Corinthians 9:10 could arise from the balance between spiritual and material rewards. Some people might see a contradiction between working for spiritual goals and expecting material benefits. The verse suggests that those who work should share in the benefits of their work, but others might question whether focusing on material rewards could detract from spiritual purpose.