Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
It states that Jesus came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it, suggesting continuity with the law rather than being "without law."
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 6:14
This verse indicates that believers are not under the law but under grace, which contrasts with the notion of being under the law to Christ.
Romans 6:14: For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:18
States that if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law, which contradicts the idea of being under the law to Christ.
Galatians 5:18: But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Contradiction with James 2:10
Suggests that breaking one point of the law means being accountable for all, implying strict adherence rather than a nuanced relationship with the law.
James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.
Paradox #1
Some people see a contradiction in the idea of being "under the law of Christ" while not being "under the law" of Moses, as this can seem confusing or conflicting within different teachings about following religious laws. This discrepancy can challenge interpretations about what rules Christians should follow.
Paradox #2
One possible contradiction in 1 Corinthians 9:21 could relate to how the early Christians viewed and followed Jewish law. Paul talks about being "under Christ's law," which might seem inconsistent with earlier Jewish traditions that emphasized the Law of Moses. This could potentially create a conflict between Jewish Christians who adhered strictly to Jewish law and Gentile Christians who were considered free from such obligations.
Paradox #3
1 Corinthians 9:21 talks about being under Christ's law while not being under the law for others. The contradiction or conflict here could be seen in trying to balance following religious rules while also adapting to different people's beliefs. It might seem inconsistent to some because it involves acting differently in different situations, which can be misunderstood as lacking firm principles.