Contradiction with 2 Thessalonians 3:10
Emphasizes the necessity of working for food, opposing the right to receive sustenance without labor.
2 Thessalonians 3:10: For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
Contradiction with Luke 10:7
States that a laborer deserves wages, contrasting with the argument for accepting provisions without question.
Luke 10:7: And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house.
Contradiction with Acts 20:33-35
Paul speaks of working for his needs and supporting others, by contrast suggesting ministers should not rely on others for support.
Acts 20:33-35: I have coveted no man's silver, or gold, or apparel.
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 2:9
Paul works night and day not to be a burden, contradicting the idea of having a right to eat and drink without working.
1 Thessalonians 2:9: For ye remember, brethren, our labour and travail: for labouring night and day, because we would not be chargeable unto any of you, we preached unto you the gospel of God.