Contradiction with Romans 3:23
This verse contradicts 1 John 1:10 by asserting that "all have sinned," which implies everyone has sin, contrary to claiming one has not sinned.
Romans 3:23: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 7:20
It states there is not a just man on earth who does good and sins not, which contradicts the notion of having no sin.
Ecclesiastes 7:20: For [there is] not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not.
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:9
This verse questions who can say they have made their heart pure and are free from sin, contradicting the claim of being without sin.
Proverbs 20:9: Who can say, I have made my heart clean, I am pure from my sin?
Contradiction with Psalm 14:3
Indicates all have turned aside and no one does good, suggesting ubiquitous sinfulness, contradicting a claim of being without sin.
Psalm 14:3: They are all gone aside, they are [all] together become filthy: [there is] none that doeth good, no, not one. [filthy: Heb. stinking]
Paradox #1
1 John 1:10 suggests that claiming to be without sin is dishonest and contrary to God's truth. A potential conflict arises when considering passages that speak of certain individuals as blameless or righteous, like Job or Noah. The tension exists between recognizing human sinfulness and acknowledging that some are described as upright. However, these descriptions often emphasize their faithfulness rather than literal perfection, aligning with the broader biblical message of universal sinfulness.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction could relate to the idea that admitting to having no sin might conflict with other biblical teachings that emphasize the inherent sinfulness of all humans. This could be seen as inconsistent with verses that stress the need for acknowledgment and repentance of sin.
Paradox #3
Some people point out a contradiction between the idea in this verse, which talks about sin, and the belief that certain figures in the Bible, like Job or Noah, were described as righteous or blameless. They wonder how someone can be both sinful, as this verse suggests applies to all, and also be called blameless. This is more of a theological debate than a historical inconsistency.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction or conflict might arise from the claim that humans are inherently sinful. Science, particularly fields like psychology and biology, generally focuses on understanding behavior through environmental, genetic, and cognitive influences rather than labeling it as inherently sinful, which is a moral or theological concept.
Paradox #5
One possible contradiction in this verse could arise when it emphasizes acknowledging sin as crucial, yet other teachings in the Bible stress forgiveness and redemption. Some might see a conflict between the need to continually admit wrongdoing and the teachings that suggest believers are cleansed or made anew. This could cause confusion about whether one's past sins still hold moral weight after forgiveness.