Contradiction with Proverbs 21:30
This verse claims no wisdom, understanding, or counsel can prevail against the LORD, contradicting any attempt like Jeroboam's plan in 1 Kings 12:26 to secure his rule through human means against God's will.
Proverbs 21:30: [There is] no wisdom nor understanding nor counsel against the LORD.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
This verse suggests God has specific plans for prosperity and not harm, which contrasts with Jeroboam's fear and plotting in 1 Kings 12:26, doubting God's purpose.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Contradiction with Isaiah 55:8-9
These verses emphasize God's thoughts and ways being higher than man's, contradicting Jeroboam's reliance on his own understanding and fears in 1 Kings 12:26.
Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5-6
Encouraging trust in the LORD and His guidance refutes Jeroboam's approach of leaning on his own understanding and devising his own plan in 1 Kings 12:26.
Proverbs 3:5-6: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:25
Jesus teaches not to worry about life and needs, which opposes the anxiety-driven political maneuvering Jeroboam exhibits in 1 Kings 12:26.
Matthew 6:25: Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
Paradox #1
This verse is part of the story about King Jeroboam of Israel, who worried that his people might return to King Rehoboam of Judah because of religious practices centered in Jerusalem. The contradiction here could involve different accounts of how religious divisions between Israel and Judah developed. While 1 Kings suggests religious decisions led to political divisions, other historical interpretations might argue political divisions came first, influencing religious practices. This can create inconsistency in understanding the timeline and causes of division between the northern and southern kingdoms.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict in that verse could involve loyalty and trust. It describes a leader worrying about losing support if people continue religious practices in a specific location, suggesting a conflict between political power and religious faithfulness. The tension lies in balancing political control with religious or spiritual integrity.