Contradictions and Paradoxes in 1 Kings 15:27

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 1 Kings 15:27 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 1 Kings 15:27. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of 1 Kings, there was a man named Baasha who wanted to be king, so he secretly planned to get rid of the current king, Nadab. Baasha attacked King Nadab when he and his army were busy fighting the Philistines, and then Baasha became the new king.

1 Kings 15:27: And Baasha the son of Ahijah, of the house of Issachar, conspired against him; and Baasha smote him at Gibbethon, which [belonged] to the Philistines; for Nadab and all Israel laid siege to Gibbethon.

Contradiction with Romans 13:1

Contradicts because it emphasizes submission to governing authorities, which would oppose Baasha's conspiracy against King Nadab in 1 Kings 15:27.

Romans 13:1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]

Contradiction with Exodus 20:13

This verse's commandment "Thou shalt not kill" contradicts Baasha's act of killing King Nadab.

Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.

Contradiction with Proverbs 24:21

Advises against associating with those given to change or rebellion, contradicting Baasha's overthrow of Nadab.

Proverbs 24:21: My son, fear thou the LORD and the king: [and] meddle not with them that are given to change: [them...: Heb. changers]

Contradiction with Matthew 5:9

States "Blessed are the peacemakers," contrasting with the violent and conspiratorial act in 1 Kings 15:27.

Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:11

Encourages seeking peace and pursuing it, which conflicts with Baasha’s violent conspiracy.

1 Peter 3:11: Let him eschew evil, and do good; let him seek peace, and ensue it.

Paradox #1

The contradiction in this situation could arise from the act of violence and betrayal involved in overthrowing a ruler, questioning the ethics of achieving power through such means. It challenges the notion of rightful leadership and the moral implications of using treachery to achieve political goals.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.