Contradictions and Paradoxes in 1 Kings 17:16

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 1 Kings 17:16 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 1 Kings 17:16. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of 1 Kings, God made sure that the jar of flour and the jug of oil never ran out because He promised it through Elijah. This shows that God keeps His promises and provides for people who trust Him.

1 Kings 17:16: [And] the barrel of meal wasted not, neither did the cruse of oil fail, according to the word of the LORD, which he spake by Elijah. [by: Heb. by the hand of]

Contradiction with Psalm 34:10

This verse suggests that those who seek the Lord shall not lack any good thing, in contrast to the miraculous and specific provision seen in 1 Kings 17:16.

Psalm 34:10: The young lions do lack, and suffer hunger: but they that seek the LORD shall not want any good [thing].

Contradiction with Matthew 6:31-32

These verses urge not to worry about food because God provides, which differs from the specific miracle of continual supply in 1 Kings 17:16.

Matthew 6:31-32: Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?

Contradiction with Luke 12:24

This verse points out natural provision by God's design as opposed to the supernatural intervention in 1 Kings 17:16.

Luke 12:24: Consider the ravens: for they neither sow nor reap; which neither have storehouse nor barn; and God feedeth them: how much more are ye better than the fowls?

Contradiction with Philippians 4:19

This verse talks about God supplying needs according to His riches, contrasting with the ongoing specific miracle of 1 Kings 17:16.

Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.

Paradox #1

The contradiction or inconsistency with this verse might be related to questions about the factual accuracy of miracles described in ancient texts. Some people might struggle with accepting the event as literally true due to the lack of scientific evidence for miraculous occurrences. Skeptics might view it as a symbolic story rather than a historical fact. However, within the context of faith and religious interpretation, it doesn’t necessarily present a contradiction.

Paradox #2

The idea of a jar of flour and a jug of oil not running out during a famine could contradict scientific understanding of matter conservation, as it suggests a never-ending supply without any natural source of replenishment. This would go against the laws of physics and chemistry, where matter cannot be created from nothing.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.