Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 36:12
This verse portrays the king doing evil and not heeding God's words through a prophet, similar to Ahab's actions, but instead of blaming others, it identifies the king himself as responsible for the consequences.
2 Chronicles 36:12: And he did [that which was] evil in the sight of the LORD his God, [and] humbled not himself before Jeremiah the prophet [speaking] from the mouth of the LORD.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
This verse emphasizes personal responsibility for sin, contradicting Ahab's accusation that Elijah is causing Israel's troubles.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with Proverbs 28:13
Encourages confession and forsaking of sins for mercy, contradicting Ahab’s behavior of blaming Elijah instead of acknowledging his own and Israel's sins.
Proverbs 28:13: He that covereth his sins shall not prosper: but whoso confesseth and forsaketh [them] shall have mercy.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:29-30
Stresses that individuals will face consequences for their own actions, contradicting Ahab’s attempt to shift the blame to Elijah.
Jeremiah 31:29-30: In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge.
Contradiction with Galatians 6:5
Emphasizes personal accountability by stating each shall bear their own burden, opposing Ahab's claim that Elijah is the cause of Israel’s problems.
Galatians 6:5: For every man shall bear his own burden.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in 1 Kings 18:18 could be seen in the blame and responsibility assignment. Ahab blames Elijah for Israel's troubles, but Elijah states that it's Ahab's own actions causing the problems by abandoning God's commands. This reflects a conflict often seen when people avoid taking responsibility for their actions, blaming others instead. It highlights the tension between human tendency to shift blame and the moral expectation to own up to one's faults.