Contradiction with Matthew 6:24
This verse states that no man can serve two masters, which highlights the impossibility of wavering between two opinions, contrasting with the choice presented in 1 Kings 18:21.
Matthew 6:24: No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
Contradiction with Joshua 24:15
Here, the emphasis is on choosing whom to serve, suggesting a definitive choice rather than wavering between options as implied in 1 Kings 18:21.
Joshua 24:15: And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that [were] on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
Contradiction with Revelation 3:15-16
This passage condemns being lukewarm, i.e., indecisive or wavering, which contradicts the indecisiveness reflected in 1 Kings 18:21.
Revelation 3:15-16: I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
Contradiction with James 1:8
This verse describes a double-minded person as unstable, highlighting the inconsistency of wavering between two opinions as in 1 Kings 18:21.
James 1:8: A double minded man [is] unstable in all his ways.
Contradiction with Matthew 12:30
This verse implies that one cannot be neutral or indecisive, opposing the call to decision in 1 Kings 18:21.
Matthew 12:30: He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in 1 Kings 18:21 could relate to the struggle between worshiping the God of Israel and worshiping Baal, highlighting a period when the Israelites were torn between different religious beliefs. It reflects ongoing tensions in ancient Israelite society between monotheistic worship of Yahweh and the prevalent polytheistic practices in the region, suggesting cultural and religious conflicts during that time.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in this passage could be seen as the challenge to choose between two beliefs or gods, which may be difficult for people who value both or who fear making the wrong choice. This can create an internal conflict for those who struggle with doubt or uncertainty about their faith.