Contradictions and Paradoxes in 1 Kings 19:17

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 1 Kings 19:17 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 1 Kings 19:17. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the book, this verse shows that God was telling a story about how different people would work together to make sure that those who are not doing the right thing would be stopped. It's like a plan where one person would catch someone first, and if that person missed someone, the next person would catch them, and if they missed, another person would catch the bad person.

1 Kings 19:17: And it shall come to pass, [that] him that escapeth the sword of Hazael shall Jehu slay: and him that escapeth from the sword of Jehu shall Elisha slay.

Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20

This verse states that the soul that sins shall die, implying individual responsibility for sin, whereas 1 Kings 19:17 implies collective judgment through Hazael and Jehu.

Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:44

This verse instructs to love your enemies and bless those who curse you, which contradicts the judgment and vengeance described in 1 Kings 19:17.

Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Contradiction with Romans 12:19

This verse tells believers not to take revenge, leaving it to God, while 1 Kings 19:17 depicts divine vengeance through human agents.

Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

Paradox #1

1 Kings 19:17 might seem to suggest an overlap in the roles of Hazael, Jehu, and Elisha in executing judgment, which could create confusion about their specific responsibilities. This could be seen as inconsistent with the clear and distinct missions given typically to prophets and kings in the Bible. However, any perceived conflict is often understood as illustrating the comprehensive nature of divine judgment through different agents.

Paradox #2

This verse could raise questions about the morality of violence or the directive given to carry out severe actions against others. It might seem inconsistent with themes of forgiveness, mercy, or peace found elsewhere in religious texts.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.