Contradiction with John 4:24
1 Kings 20:23 suggests God can be limited to the hills, while John 4:24 states God is spirit and thus omnipresent.
John 4:24: God [is] a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship [him] in spirit and in truth.
Contradiction with Psalm 139:7-8
1 Kings 20:23 implies God is limited in location, while Psalm 139:7-8 emphasizes God’s omnipresence, being present everywhere including heaven and hell.
Psalm 139:7-8: Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence?
Contradiction with Jeremiah 23:24
1 Kings 20:23 suggests God is confined to specific locations like hills, whereas Jeremiah 23:24 says no one can hide from God and He fills heaven and earth.
Jeremiah 23:24: Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the LORD. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith the LORD.
Contradiction with 1 Kings 8:27
1 Kings 20:23 implies a geographical limitation of God's presence, but 1 Kings 8:27 states that even the heavens cannot contain God, suggesting His omnipresence.
1 Kings 8:27: But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded?
Contradiction with Isaiah 66:1
1 Kings 20:23 implies God dwells specifically in the hills, contrary to Isaiah 66:1, which declares heaven as God's throne and earth as His footstool, signifying His vast dominion.
Isaiah 66:1: Thus saith the LORD, The heaven [is] my throne, and the earth [is] my footstool: where [is] the house that ye build unto me? and where [is] the place of my rest?
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in 1 Kings 20:23 could be the implication that God's power is limited to certain locations, like being a "god of the hills." This conflicts with the broader biblical teaching that God's power is universal and not confined to any particular place. The Bible generally emphasizes God's sovereignty over all creation, not just specific areas.
Paradox #2
The verse itself could suggest a misunderstanding of God's power being limited to specific locations, such as the hills. This could be seen as inconsistent with the broader biblical teaching that God's power is universal and not limited to specific geographical areas.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction or conflict in this verse arises from the idea that God is limited to a certain place or condition, like being a God of only hills and not valleys. This perception can challenge the belief in an all-powerful, omnipresent God who is not confined to specific locations or scenarios. It reflects an inconsistency in understanding the nature of God.