Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Instructs to not resist evil but to turn the other cheek, while 1 Kings 20:35 involves commanding harm to another as a test of obedience.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Commands not to kill, yet 1 Kings 20:35 involves a prophet asking to be smitten.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Advises against repaying evil for evil, contrasting with the test of obedience involving harm in 1 Kings 20:35.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:22
Encourages not to say "I will recompense evil," whereas 1 Kings 20:35 involves an instruction to inflict harm.
Proverbs 20:22: Say not thou, I will recompense evil; [but] wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Commands to love your enemies and do good to those who hate you; 1 Kings 20:35 involves a command that could harm someone.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Paradox #1
The verse in question involves a prophet telling someone to strike him, which may seem inconsistent with the broader biblical themes of peace and non-violence. Such actions might appear contradictory to teachings elsewhere that promote love and kindness. This could lead to questions about why violence is used in this context. However, the story might highlight themes of obedience or illustrate a prophetic message rather than condone violence.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in 1 Kings 20:35 lies in the fact that a prophet commands someone to harm another person to fulfill a divine instruction, which can seem inconsistent with the general moral teaching against harming others. This situation creates a conflict between obeying a perceived divine command and adhering to moral principles of non-violence.