Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Contradicts the principle of retribution shown in 1 Kings 20:36 by advocating for turning the other cheek instead of seeking vengeance or inflicting harm.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Contradicts 1 Kings 20:36 by promoting love and kindness towards enemies, rather than delivering punishment or destruction.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Contrasts with the immediate and harsh punishment in 1 Kings 20:36 by teaching not to repay evil for evil.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Highlights mercy over judgment, which goes against the swift enactment of judgment seen in 1 Kings 20:36.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:23
Emphasizes God's desire for the wicked to turn from their ways and live, contrasting the swift punishment without repentance opportunity in 1 Kings 20:36.
Ezekiel 18:23: Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: [and] not that he should return from his ways, and live?
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in 1 Kings 20:36 could be the harsh punishment given to someone who disobeys a prophet by refusing to strike him. This might seem inconsistent with the idea of a compassionate and forgiving God, as the consequence seems severe for what might be perceived as a minor disobedience. Some readers might struggle to understand why such a strict response was necessary.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency in 1 Kings 20:36 might involve the severity of the punishment delivered to the prophet. It raises questions about the nature of justice and mercy, and why such a harsh penalty was given for what might be seen as a minor disobedience. This could be in tension with other biblical teachings on forgiveness and mercy.
Paradox #3
This verse might seem morally contradictory because a prophet predicts harsh punishment for someone who refuses to injure him when asked. It could be confusing why a person would be punished for not harming another, which might seem like a good moral choice. This creates a tension between the seemingly required obedience to a prophet and the general moral rule against causing harm.