Contradiction with Proverbs 16:7
This verse suggests that when a man's ways please the Lord, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him, contrasting with 1 Kings 22:27, where Micaiah, a prophet speaking God's truth, is imprisoned.
Proverbs 16:7: When a man's ways please the LORD, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:10
This verse states that those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake are blessed, which contrasts with the punishment and imprisonment described in 1 Kings 22:27.
Matthew 5:10: Blessed [are] they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Contradiction with Psalm 37:28
This verse affirms that the Lord does not forsake His saints and preserves them, which contradicts the imprisonment of Micaiah.
Psalm 37:28: For the LORD loveth judgment, and forsaketh not his saints; they are preserved for ever: but the seed of the wicked shall be cut off.
Contradiction with Psalm 34:19
This verse promises deliverance from afflictions for the righteous, conflicting with Micaiah's imprisonment for speaking God's word.
Psalm 34:19: Many [are] the afflictions of the righteous: but the LORD delivereth him out of them all.
Contradiction with 2 Timothy 3:12
This verse forewarns that all who desire to live godly lives will face persecution, offering a different perspective on the adversities faced by Micaiah.
2 Timothy 3:12: Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.
Contradiction with Isaiah 54:17
This verse declares that no weapon formed against God's servants will prosper, contradicting the harm and imprisonment faced by Micaiah.
Isaiah 54:17: No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue [that] shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This [is] the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness [is] of me, saith the LORD.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in 1 Kings 22:27 could involve the mistreatment or punishment of a prophet or messenger for delivering an unpopular or negative message. This can conflict with the moral value of justice and fairness, as it raises questions about whether it is right to punish someone simply for speaking the truth or for their role as a messenger.