Contradictions and Paradoxes in 1 Kings 2:27

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 1 Kings 2:27 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 1 Kings 2:27. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the book, Solomon removed Abiathar from being a priest because that was part of God's plan. God had spoken long ago that something like this would happen to Eli's family.

1 Kings 2:27: So Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being priest unto the LORD; that he might fulfil the word of the LORD, which he spake concerning the house of Eli in Shiloh.

Contradiction with Numbers 25:13

Describes a perpetual priesthood through Phinehas, indicating a lasting covenant, unlike the cutting off of Abiathar's priesthood in 1 Kings 2:27.

Numbers 25:13: And he shall have it, and his seed after him, [even] the covenant of an everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for his God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel.

Contradiction with Exodus 40:15

States that the priesthood is an everlasting ordinance for Aaron and his sons, which appears to contrast with the termination of Abiathar's line.

Exodus 40:15: And thou shalt anoint them, as thou didst anoint their father, that they may minister unto me in the priest's office: for their anointing shall surely be an everlasting priesthood throughout their generations.

Contradiction with Hebrews 7:24

Speaks of Jesus having an unchangeable priesthood, implying permanence in contrast to the ending of Abiathar’s priesthood.

Hebrews 7:24: But this [man], because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood. [an...: or, which passeth not from one to another]

Paradox #1

1 Kings 2:27 involves the removal of a priest from his office, which can raise questions about the consistency of divine promises and the fulfillment of prophecy. This verse might seem to conflict with earlier promises made to the priesthood. The challenge lies in understanding how human actions and divine plans intersect, and how previous assurances align with subsequent events and decisions.

Paradox #2

1 Kings 2:27 might seem to conflict with earlier promises made to Eli's family about their ongoing priestly role in Israel. In previous texts, Eli's descendants were promised a lasting priesthood. However, this verse shows the end of that promise due to their actions, suggesting a contradiction between the promise and the outcome.

Paradox #3

The contradiction lies in the change of priesthood from Eli's family. Earlier biblical texts suggest an eternal promise to Eli's lineage, yet this verse indicates their removal, which creates a conflict between divine promises and historical actions.

← 1 Kings 2:26
Share
1 Kings 2:28 →
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.