Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
Contradicts as it states God desires all men to be saved, whereas 1 Peter 1:2 implies a selection.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
Suggests God is not willing for any to perish, contrasting with the notion of foreordained election.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with John 3:16
Indicates God's love is for the whole world, not a specific elect as suggested by 1 Peter 1:2.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with Matthew 22:14
"For many are called, but few are chosen" suggests a broader calling, conflicting with the idea of specific election.
Matthew 22:14: Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in [his] talk.
Contradiction with Romans 10:13
States that whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved, which is more inclusive than election in 1 Peter 1:2.
Romans 10:13: For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Paradox #1
1 Peter 1:2 mentions concepts like "foreknowledge," "election," and "sanctification." Some people see a contradiction with the idea of free will, wondering how humans can have freedom if God chooses or knows everything in advance. They question how humans can be responsible for their actions if everything is already predetermined by God's plan.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in 1 Peter 1:2 could arise from the concept of predestination versus free will. Some people might see a conflict between the idea that God chooses people beforehand and the belief that individuals have the freedom to choose their own path. This can lead to questions about responsibility and fairness in moral decisions.