Contradiction with Acts 5:29
This verse emphasizes obeying God rather than human authorities, which can contradict the call for submission to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake.
Acts 5:29: Then Peter and the [other] apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
Contradiction with Exodus 1:17
The Hebrew midwives disobeyed the king of Egypt, which contrasts with the instruction to submit to authority.
Exodus 1:17: But the midwives feared God, and did not as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the men children alive.
Contradiction with Daniel 3:18
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refused to worship the king’s idol, opposing the concept of submitting to every human ordinance.
Daniel 3:18: But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.
Contradiction with Daniel 6:10
Daniel defies the king's decree by praying to God, highlighting a contradiction with the submission to governing authorities.
Daniel 6:10: Now when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house; and his windows being open in his chamber toward Jerusalem, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime.
Contradiction with Esther 4:16
Esther approaches the king without being summoned, disregarding the law, which contradicts submissive adherence to authority.
Esther 4:16: Go, gather together all the Jews that are present in Shushan, and fast ye for me, and neither eat nor drink three days, night or day: I also and my maidens will fast likewise; and so will I go in unto the king, which [is] not according to the law: and if I perish, I perish. [present: Heb. found]
Contradiction with Matthew 2:12
The wise men disobey King Herod's orders, showing a scenario where divine guidance overrule earthly authority.
Matthew 2:12: And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way.
Paradox #1
Some people see a potential conflict with this verse about submitting to authority, especially if the authority is unjust or contradicts other biblical principles like justice and compassion. Some might wonder how to reconcile submitting to governing authorities if those authorities enact laws that seem contrary to God's teachings. This can create a tension between obeying civil law and following one's conscience or religious principles.
Paradox #2
1 Peter 2:13 discusses submitting to authority. The potential doctrinal conflict arises when considering other biblical teachings that emphasize obedience to God over human authority. For example, Acts 5:29 talks about obeying God rather than men, which can seem contradictory if human laws conflict with God's commands. Balancing respect for earthly authorities while maintaining fidelity to divine principles can be challenging and might appear inconsistent.
Paradox #3
1 Peter 2:13 advises followers to submit to every human authority. The contradiction or inconsistency here could relate to times when biblical teachings have conflicted with oppressive regimes or unjust laws. For instance, early Christians were persecuted by Roman authorities, to whom they were told to submit, creating a potential conflict between following authority and maintaining their faith. Similarly, in modern contexts, this verse can contradict movements that resist unjust or tyrannical governments. This raises questions about when it is appropriate to disobey authority for a higher moral or ethical cause.
Paradox #4
A contradiction or conflict in that verse could be the tension between obeying human authorities and following one's conscience or religious principles. If a government's laws contradict personal or religious morals, a believer might struggle to decide whether to follow the law or their faith.