Contradiction with Genesis 7:21-22
1 Peter 3:20 mentions eight people being saved by water, whereas Genesis 7:21-22 states that all flesh died in the flood, suggesting no one was saved by water.
Genesis 7:21-22: And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
Contradiction with 2 Peter 2:5
1 Peter 3:20 highlights the salvation through water during the flood, whereas 2 Peter 2:5 focuses on Noah as a preacher of righteousness without emphasizing the aspect of salvation through water.
2 Peter 2:5: And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth [person], a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;
Contradiction with Hebrews 9:27
1 Peter 3:20 speaks of eight souls being saved, implying divine intervention, whereas Hebrews 9:27 emphasizes that judgment comes after death, suggesting each individual's fate without exception.
Hebrews 9:27: And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Contradiction with Matthew 24:39
1 Peter 3:20 implies preparation and salvation, but Matthew 24:39 describes the people as unaware and swept away by the flood, indicating a lack of foresight or salvation for those outside the ark.
Matthew 24:39: And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Paradox #1
1 Peter 3:20 might raise questions about God's patience and fairness. The verse talks about God waiting patiently while Noah built the ark, which could seem inconsistent with the idea of God wanting to save all people. If God is all-loving and all-powerful, some might wonder why only Noah's family was saved and not others, potentially creating a dilemma regarding God's fairness and mercy.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in 1 Peter 3:20 could relate to differing interpretations of the flood story in Genesis and the number of people saved. Genesis says only eight people were saved in the ark, but some traditions or readings suggest larger groups. Different interpretations of time and events related to Noah's story can also lead to varying views.
Paradox #3
The contradiction related to 1 Peter 3:20 involves the idea of a global flood that covered the entire Earth, as described in the story of Noah's Ark. Scientifically, there is no evidence of a worldwide flood happening at that time in history. Geological and biological evidence suggests that such a flood, covering all the earth's highest mountains, is not feasible. Additionally, the logistics of fitting all animal species in a single ark and maintaining them also pose scientific challenges.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in 1 Peter 3:20 could be seen in the perception of God's patience versus His decision to save only a few (Noah's family) during the flood while allowing others to perish. This might seem inconsistent with the idea of a universally loving and merciful God.