Contradiction with John 3:17
While 1 Peter 4:17 mentions judgment beginning at the house of God, John 3:17 states that God did not send his Son to condemn the world but to save it, suggesting a focus on salvation rather than judgment.
John 3:17: For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Contradiction with Romans 8:1
1 Peter 4:17 discusses judgment beginning with God’s household, whereas Romans 8:1 emphasizes that there is no condemnation for those in Christ Jesus, suggesting a freedom from judgment.
Romans 8:1: [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:30
1 Peter 4:17 refers to judgment beginning with believers, but Hebrews 10:30 emphasizes that vengeance and judgment belong solely to God, implying it's not immediate upon believers.
Hebrews 10:30: For we know him that hath said, Vengeance [belongeth] unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
Contradiction with John 12:47
1 Peter 4:17 speaks of judgment beginning at God's house, yet John 12:47 indicates that Jesus came not to judge but to save, focusing on saving rather than condemning.
John 12:47: And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 11:32
1 Peter 4:17 talks about judgment starting with the household of God, whereas 1 Corinthians 11:32 suggests believers are disciplined to avoid being condemned with the world, implying judgment for corrective purposes.
1 Corinthians 11:32: But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction with 1 Peter 4:17 could be the question of why judgment begins with believers, who are seen as already saved, rather than with those who are not believers. This might seem inconsistent with the understanding of grace and salvation that is extended to those who have faith in God.
Paradox #2
1 Peter 4:17 can raise questions about why judgment starts with believers if they are already saved through faith. Some might see this as inconsistent with the idea of salvation by grace, questioning why the faithful are judged. It can lead to confusion about the role of judgment and grace in the life of believers.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency issue with 1 Peter 4:17 could relate to the concept of judgment starting "at the house of God," which might seem to conflict with the idea of grace and forgiveness emphasized in other parts of the New Testament. Some readers may find it inconsistent with messages that suggest believers are already justified and saved by faith, thus not facing judgment in the same way. This could appear contradictory if one assumes believers are spared from the kind of judgement that might imply punishment rather than discipline or refining.
Paradox #4
This verse suggests that judgment begins with believers, which could seem inconsistent with the idea of a loving and forgiving God. It might create a conflict for those who believe that faith in God should lead to protection from judgment rather than the initiation of it.