Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 7:20
1 Samuel 13:13 suggests that Saul could have been faultless in establishing his kingdom, while Ecclesiastes 7:20 states that no one is without sin.
Ecclesiastes 7:20: For [there is] not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not.
Contradiction with Romans 3:23
1 Samuel 13:13 implies a missed opportunity for Saul to be perfect, but Romans 3:23 declares that all have sinned.
Romans 3:23: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Contradiction with 1 John 1:8
1 Samuel 13:13 indicates Saul could have maintained a sinless state for God's favor, whereas 1 John 1:8 asserts self-deception in claiming to be without sin.
1 John 1:8: If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
Contradiction with Genesis 8:21
1 Samuel 13:13 implies perfection was possible for Saul, but Genesis 8:21 acknowledges the inherent evil in human heart.
Genesis 8:21: And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart [is] evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done. [a sweet...: Heb. a savour of rest or, satisfaction] [for the imagination: or, through the imagination]
Paradox #1
1 Samuel 13:13 suggests that Samuel tells Saul he has acted foolishly and disobeyed God's command, costing him his kingdom. The potential contradiction or inconsistency here could be about the nature of God's will and decision-making. Some might point out that despite Saul's disobedience, he remains king for a significant time. Additionally, the role of divine predestination versus human free will could be seen as conflicting themes. If viewed as historical, it raises questions about the fairness and timing of the divine judgment on Saul.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in 1 Samuel 13:13 might be about divine fairness and punishment. Saul is punished for not waiting for Samuel before making a sacrifice. Some might see this as inconsistent because Saul's intention was to seek God's favor in a difficult situation, yet he faced severe consequences despite his good intentions. This raises questions about the nature of punishment and mercy in the context of obedience and leadership.