Contradiction with Genesis 1:31
This verse says everything God made was very good, contradicting the notion of disobedience in 1 Samuel 15:19.
Genesis 1:31: And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, [it was] very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. [And the evening...: Heb. And the evening was, and the morning was etc.]
Contradiction with Exodus 20:12
This verse commands honoring authority, which contradicts Saul's disobedience to God's command in 1 Samuel 15:19.
Exodus 20:12: Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5
Trusting in the Lord contradicts Saul's reliance on his own judgment in 1 Samuel 15:19.
Proverbs 3:5: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:24
This verse states you cannot serve two masters, contradicting Saul's divided loyalty to God and his desires in 1 Samuel 15:19.
Matthew 6:24: No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
Contradiction with James 1:22
Encourages being doers of the word, contradicting Saul's failure to fully obey God's command in 1 Samuel 15:19.
James 1:22: But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.
Paradox #1
1 Samuel 15:19 may appear to show a contradiction around obedience to God’s commands. Saul was instructed to completely destroy the Amalekites and all their possessions, but he spared the king and kept some of the best livestock. This can seem inconsistent with the idea that God's commands are absolute and must be followed precisely. The conflict arises from human interpretation or failure to fully understand or adhere to God's instructions, suggesting a tension between divine command and human action.
Paradox #2
1 Samuel 15:19 could present a contradiction in the context of divine instructions and human actions. The verse highlights King Saul's disobedience to God's command to completely destroy the Amalekites and all their possessions. The conflict arises when Saul spares King Agag and the best livestock, which seems inconsistent with God's explicit instructions to leave nothing alive. This situation raises questions about the nature of obedience to divine commands and how human interpretation and desires can lead to actions that diverge from those commands.
Paradox #3
One possible contradiction in this verse could be the conflict between obedience to divine commands and the compassionate treatment of others. The verse suggests strict adherence to a command that involves violence, which might clash with modern moral values that emphasize mercy and forgiveness. This could lead to questioning how these principles fit together.