1 Samuel 17:36 Contradictions and Paradoxes

According to the author of the book, this verse shows that David, a young shepherd, is very brave and trusting in God. He believes that just like he was able to beat a lion and a bear, he can also defeat the giant because the giant is being mean to God's people.

Contradiction with Exodus 14:14

This verse emphasizes that the Lord will fight for you and you need only to be still, which contrasts with David's active role in defeating the lion, bear, and Goliath in his strength and God's help.

Exodus 14:14: The LORD shall fight for you, and ye shall hold your peace.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:39

Here, Jesus teaches to turn the other cheek rather than retaliate, which contrasts with David’s act of violence and triumph over the threats.

Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

Contradiction with Romans 12:17

This verse advises against repaying evil with evil, whereas David repays threat with violence.

Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.

Contradiction with Luke 6:27

Jesus instructs to love your enemies, which contradicts the violent stance David takes against his foes.

Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,

Paradox #1

1 Samuel 17:36 might be seen as conflicting if someone argues that it portrays a reliance on personal strength and skill rather than solely on faith in God. Some might see this as inconsistent with parts of the Bible that emphasize total dependence on God's power rather than human ability. However, this interpretation depends on how one views the relationship between faith and action in biblical narratives.

Paradox #2

In the story of David and Goliath, different chapters of the Bible provide varying details about who killed Goliath. 1 Samuel 17 describes David killing Goliath, while 2 Samuel 21:19 mentions another warrior named Elhanan killing Goliath. This creates a historical inconsistency about who actually killed him.

Paradox #3

The contradiction in the verse could be the description of a young shepherd fighting and killing a lion and a bear with his bare hands. In a scientific and realistic view, a young person would not have the strength or physical capability to defeat such strong and dangerous animals without weapons or tools.