Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
This verse suggests a soft answer can prevent wrath, contrasting with the violence displayed.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse commands to love enemies, contradicting the hostility in 1 Samuel 20:33.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Advises against repaying evil for evil, opposing the aggression shown.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Commands "Thou shalt not kill," which conflicts with intent to harm.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:31
Advises to put away anger and malice, which contrasts with the anger exhibited.
Ephesians 4:31: Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice:
Paradox #1
1 Samuel 20:33 involves Saul attempting to harm his son Jonathan for supporting David. The contradiction here is that Saul, as a king and father, should protect and love his family, yet he tries to harm Jonathan. This goes against the values of fatherly care and protection.