Contradictions and Paradoxes in 1 Samuel 20:8

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 1 Samuel 20:8 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 1 Samuel 20:8. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the book, this verse is about a promise of friendship and kindness between two friends. It shows how they trust each other and want to be honest, even when it's hard.

1 Samuel 20:8: Therefore thou shalt deal kindly with thy servant; for thou hast brought thy servant into a covenant of the LORD with thee: notwithstanding, if there be in me iniquity, slay me thyself; for why shouldest thou bring me to thy father?

Contradiction with Romans 12:17

1 Samuel 20:8 asks for kindness and mercy for David, while Romans 12:17 advises against repaying evil with evil, promoting peace instead of vengeance.

Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:44

1 Samuel 20:8 involves seeking protection and dealing with enemies through a pact, while Matthew 5:44 teaches to love and pray for enemies rather than forming alliances for protection against them.

Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Contradiction with Exodus 21:24

In 1 Samuel 20:8, David appeals for mercy and protection, whereas Exodus 21:24 prescribes "an eye for an eye," underscoring retributive justice rather than the mercy David seeks.

Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

Contradiction with Proverbs 24:29

David's request in 1 Samuel 20:8 for kindness implies trusting his ally for protection, while Proverbs 24:29 warns against taking personal revenge, suggesting trust in divine justice instead.

Proverbs 24:29: Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me: I will render to the man according to his work.

Contradiction with Luke 6:29

1 Samuel 20:8 involves seeking protection through human intervention, contrasting with Luke 6:29, which advises offering the other cheek and not resisting wrongdoing.

Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.

Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9

David asks Jonathan for protection due to past kindness in 1 Samuel 20:8, while 1 Peter 3:9 instructs not to repay evil with evil or insult with insult, but with blessing, emphasizing forgiveness.

1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.

Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18

1 Samuel 20:8 focuses on a personal pact for safety due to past kindness, whereas Leviticus 19:18 advises against seeking revenge or bearing a grudge, encouraging love for neighbor instead.

Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.

Paradox #1

The contradiction in this verse could be seen in the tension between loyalty to friends versus loyalty to family or authority. The verse may highlight a situation where someone's personal commitment to a friend conflicts with societal or familial duties, presenting a dilemma about where one's loyalty should lie.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.