Contradiction with 1 Samuel 23:4
Here, David inquires of the Lord for guidance rather than seeking human protection, suggesting that divine consultation was his primary approach rather than seeking asylum with allies.
1 Samuel 23:4: Then David enquired of the LORD yet again. And the LORD answered him and said, Arise, go down to Keilah; for I will deliver the Philistines into thine hand.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 27:1
David doubts his safety and relies on his own plans by fleeing to the Philistines, in contrast to relying on his family’s aid or divine direction like in 1 Samuel 22:3.
1 Samuel 27:1: And David said in his heart, I shall now perish one day by the hand of Saul: [there is] nothing better for me than that I should speedily escape into the land of the Philistines; and Saul shall despair of me, to seek me any more in any coast of Israel: so shall I escape out of his hand. [perish: Heb. be consumed]
Contradiction with Psalm 27:1
This verse expresses complete trust in the Lord for safety, contradicting David's need to seek protection through human means as seen in 1 Samuel 22:3.
Psalm 27:1: [[A Psalm] of David.] The LORD [is] my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the LORD [is] the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?
Contradiction with Jeremiah 17:5
This verse cautions against trusting in man for protection, while 1 Samuel 22:3 shows David seeking refuge and protection through Moab’s king for his family.
Jeremiah 17:5: Thus saith the LORD; Cursed [be] the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:31-33
These verses emphasize reliance on God’s provision rather than seeking security through earthly alliances, contrasting David's actions in 1 Samuel 22:3.
Matthew 6:31-33: Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?