Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
While 1 Samuel 26:15 involves a confrontation and reprimand, Matthew 5:44 advocates for loving and praying for one's enemies.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This commandment, "Thou shalt not kill," contrasts with the context of military conflict and the potential for violence seen in 1 Samuel 26:15.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Romans instructs to "recompense to no man evil for evil," which contrasts with the reproachful tone in 1 Samuel 26:15.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
This verse advises a soft answer to turn away wrath, which is in contrast to the confrontational approach seen in 1 Samuel 26:15.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with John 18:36
Jesus speaks of His kingdom not being of this world, suggesting a spiritual approach, unlike the earthly confrontation in 1 Samuel 26:15.
John 18:36: Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Paradox #1
1 Samuel 26:15 involves contradictions related to themes of leadership and responsibility. It could be seen as inconsistent because it highlights a moment where a leader's failure to protect shows a lack of accountability, conflicting with the expectation that leaders should always safeguard their people.