Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse commands "Thou shalt not kill," while 1 Samuel 27:11 involves killing all inhabitants to prevent them from informing against David.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
This verse instructs "Love your enemies," which contrasts with the actions of David in killing his enemies in 1 Samuel 27:11.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Jesus teaches to "pray for them which despitefully use you," opposing David's approach of leaving no survivors.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:18
Advises to live peaceably with all men, contrary to David's actions of eliminating entire populations.
Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 12:10
Describes a righteous man having regard for the life of his beast, contrasting David's disregard for the lives of his enemies.
Proverbs 12:10: A righteous [man] regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked [are] cruel. [tender...: or, bowels]
Paradox #1
1 Samuel 27:11 could raise questions about morality and honesty. In the context, David acts deceptively for his survival. This might seem contradictory to biblical teachings that generally emphasize truth and integrity. The challenge is understanding why such actions are depicted without clear moral judgment, which can confuse readers about what behaviors are truly acceptable.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction related to 1 Samuel 27:11 is that David is described as not leaving any survivors in his raids to prevent information from reaching the Philistines. This seems inconsistent with other portrayals of David as a righteous and just leader, raising questions about his moral character in this instance. This account also contrasts with other biblical narratives that highlight the importance of mercy and ethical conduct, creating a possible conflict within the text regarding the ethical standards expected of leaders.
Paradox #3
The moral conflict in this verse could be the contradiction between the act of deception and the values of honesty and integrity that are generally promoted in religious teachings. It involves acting in a way that may be seen as unethical to achieve a goal, which can conflict with the idea of being truthful and just.