Contradiction with Numbers 18:7
Numbers 18:7 specifies that priestly duties include only Aaron and his descendants, while 1 Samuel 2:28 mentions Eli's lineage, suggesting additional lines for priesthood.
Numbers 18:7: Therefore thou and thy sons with thee shall keep your priest's office for every thing of the altar, and within the vail; and ye shall serve: I have given your priest's office [unto you] as a service of gift: and the stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to death.
Contradiction with Exodus 28:1
Exodus 28:1 appoints Aaron and his sons for priesthood, but 1 Samuel 2:28 seems to imply a continuation through Eli, contradicting the Aaronic exclusivity.
Exodus 28:1: And take thou unto thee Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him, from among the children of Israel, that he may minister unto me in the priest's office, [even] Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar, Aaron's sons.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:11-12
Hebrews 7:11-12 discusses a change in priesthood from the Levitical order, which conflicts with 1 Samuel 2:28's affirmation of an established, unchanging priestly line through Eli.
Hebrews 7:11-12: If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Contradiction with Matthew 12:6
Matthew 12:6 highlights that something greater than the temple is present, undermining the legacy of traditional priesthood represented by 1 Samuel 2:28.
Matthew 12:6: But I say unto you, That in this place is [one] greater than the temple.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in "1 Samuel 2:28" might arise from the concept of divine selection of priests and the existence of supernatural events or beings. Science relies on empirical evidence and the natural world, while divine selection implies a supernatural choice or intervention, which is not something that can be scientifically tested or observed. This creates a conflict between faith-based beliefs and empirical scientific methods.
Paradox #2
One potential moral conflict in 1 Samuel 2:28 could be the idea of favoritism. The verse speaks about God choosing a specific family for priesthood duties. This might raise questions about fairness and equality, as it implies that God favors certain people over others without considering their individual qualities or actions. This could conflict with the idea of treating everyone equally.