Contradiction with Numbers 23:19
This verse states that God does not lie or repent, whereas 1 Samuel 2:30 implies a change in God's promise.
Numbers 23:19: God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
Contradiction with Malachi 3:6
This verse states that God does not change, contradicting the notion in 1 Samuel 2:30 of God changing His mind about honoring Eli's house.
Malachi 3:6: For I [am] the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.
Contradiction with James 1:17
It emphasizes that God has no variation or shadow of turning, contradicting God changing His declaration in 1 Samuel 2:30.
James 1:17: Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:8
It affirms that Jesus Christ, as God, is the same forever, conflicting with 1 Samuel 2:30 where God revokes a promise.
Hebrews 13:8: Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Contradiction with Psalm 110:4
States that God's declaration is unchangeable, while 1 Samuel 2:30 shows a reversal of God's promise.
Psalm 110:4: The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou [art] a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.
Paradox #1
1 Samuel 2:30 might seem to show a contradiction by suggesting that God changes His mind or breaks promises. In the verse, God initially makes a promise but later says He will not honor it due to certain actions. This could seem inconsistent with the idea that God is unchanging and always keeps His promises. However, many theologians interpret this as God responding to people's actions while still being faithful to His nature and standards.
Paradox #2
1 Samuel 2:30 suggests that God changes His mind based on people's actions, by initially promising honor but later revoking it due to disobedience. This can be seen as conflicting with other parts of the Bible that portray God as unchanging and steadfast in His promises. This raises questions about the consistency of God's nature and promises.
Paradox #3
The possible contradiction in this verse could relate to the change in God's promise. Initially, God's promise to the house of Eli seemed everlasting, but later, due to their disobedience, it was revoked. This shift might seem inconsistent with the idea of unchanging divine promises.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in 1 Samuel 2:30 could be seen in the idea of God initially promising honor to certain people but then taking it back due to their actions. This might conflict with the idea of an all-knowing God who should have foreseen their actions or seems to contradict the notion of unconditional promises or love.