Contradiction with 2 Samuel 1:10
This verse contradicts 1 Samuel 31:9 as it describes an Amalekite claiming to have killed Saul, whereas 1 Samuel 31:9 depicts the Philistines finding Saul's body on Mount Gilboa after he died by suicide.
2 Samuel 1:10: So I stood upon him, and slew him, because I was sure that he could not live after that he was fallen: and I took the crown that [was] upon his head, and the bracelet that [was] on his arm, and have brought them hither unto my lord.
Paradox #1
There is a potential contradiction between 1 Samuel 31:9 and 2 Samuel 21:12. In 1 Samuel 31:9, it is said that Saul's body was fastened to the wall of Beth Shan by the Philistines. However, in 2 Samuel 21:12, it is mentioned that Saul's body was taken by the people of Jabesh Gilead from the Philistines and was elsewhere. This discrepancy involves different accounts of what happened to Saul's body after his death.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict could relate to the treatment of the dead with respect. In many cultures and religious teachings, including other parts of the Bible, there is an expectation to treat the bodies of the deceased with dignity and respect. If a verse describes actions that seem to disrespect or dishonor a dead body, it might appear to conflict with those broader ethical teachings or expectations.