Contradiction with Matthew 28:20
This verse promises Jesus's continual presence, which contradicts the idea of God's glory departing as in 1 Samuel 4:22.
Matthew 28:20: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.
Contradiction with Joshua 1:5
This verse assures that God will not leave or forsake, opposing the notion of God's departure in 1 Samuel 4:22.
Joshua 1:5: There shall not any man be able to stand before thee all the days of thy life: as I was with Moses, [so] I will be with thee: I will not fail thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
This verse states God will never leave or forsake His people, contradicting the departure of God's glory in 1 Samuel 4:22.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Psalm 139:7-10
These verses speak of God's omnipresence, opposing the idea of His glory departing as mentioned in 1 Samuel 4:22.
Psalm 139:7-10: Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence?
Paradox #1
The verse concerns the departure of the Ark of the Covenant from Israel, symbolizing the absence of God's presence and glory. A potential theological conflict might arise from the belief that God's presence is everywhere and not confined to any physical structure. Here, the verse implies a specific location for God's presence, which could be seen as inconsistent with the notion of God's omnipresence.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding 1 Samuel 4:22 could arise from the perception of God's presence and its relationship with physical objects, like the Ark of the Covenant. It raises questions about whether God's presence is tied to specific items or places, which could conflict with the broader theological understanding that God is omnipresent and not limited by physical objects.
Paradox #3
The verse "1 Samuel 4:22" involves the loss of the Ark of the Covenant to the Philistines, which could historically conflict with its significance as a powerful religious artifact believed to grant victory. The inconsistency lies in how such a critical symbol of divine favor could be lost at all if it truly provided God's protection and favor over Israel. This could raise questions about the invulnerability of God's chosen people, as depicted in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction or inconsistency in 1 Samuel 4:22 could be related to the idea of God's presence departing from a people or place. On one hand, the Bible often describes God as being omnipresent and faithful to His followers, but this verse implies that God's presence can leave people due to their actions or circumstances. This can appear conflicting with the belief in God's constant presence and support.