Contradiction with Deuteronomy 17:14-15
These verses give guidelines for appointing a king, which implies that having a king is permissible, contradicting the negative implications of monarchy in 1 Samuel 8:16.
Deuteronomy 17:14-15: When thou art come unto the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that [are] about me;
Contradiction with Romans 13:1
This verse instructs obedience to governing authorities as they are established by God, contrasting the warning against kingship found in 1 Samuel 8:16.
Romans 13:1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 10:24
Samuel tells the people to see the king whom the Lord has chosen, suggesting divine approval, in contrast to the negative view of kings in 1 Samuel 8:16.
1 Samuel 10:24: And Samuel said to all the people, See ye him whom the LORD hath chosen, that [there is] none like him among all the people? And all the people shouted, and said, God save the king. [God...: Heb. Let the king live]
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 12:13
Samuel acknowledges the Lord has set a king over Israel, which seems contradictory to the concerns about kings in 1 Samuel 8:16.
1 Samuel 12:13: Now therefore behold the king whom ye have chosen, [and] whom ye have desired! and, behold, the LORD hath set a king over you.
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in 1 Samuel 8:16 could be the concept of a king exercising authority over people’s possessions. This contradicts the idea of individual freedom and equal ownership, as it suggests a ruler can take what belongs to others, putting the interests of those in power over the personal rights of individuals.