Contradiction with Genesis 9:3
This verse states that every moving thing that lives shall be food, which contrasts with the restriction on meats mentioned in 1 Timothy 4:3.
Genesis 9:3: Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
Contradiction with Acts 10:13-15
God tells Peter not to call anything impure that He has made clean, opposing the idea of abstaining from certain meats.
Acts 10:13-15: And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
This verse advises not to let anyone judge in matters of food, contradicting the imposition of abstaining from meats described in 1 Timothy 4:3.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Romans 14:3
It emphasizes that one who eats everything must not look down on the one who does not, differing in approach to dietary restrictions from 1 Timothy 4:3.
Romans 14:3: Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, opposing the concept of abstaining from meats as mentioned in 1 Timothy 4:3.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Paradox #1
1 Timothy 4:3 presents a conflict by suggesting that certain restrictions, such as forbidding marriage or certain foods, are not aligned with God's teachings. This can seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible where specific dietary laws or lifestyle choices, like those in the Old Testament, are prescribed or valued. This raises questions about which rules and traditions are meant to be followed by Christians.
Paradox #2
Some people find a contradiction in this verse because it talks about prohibiting marriage and certain foods, which seems to conflict with other Bible teachings that honor marriage and allow eating various foods. In other parts of the Bible, marriage is seen as good, and eating different foods is often accepted unless specific dietary laws apply. So, the potential contradiction arises because this verse appears to go against those ideas.
Paradox #3
Some people note a contradiction between this verse and other parts of the Bible that discuss dietary laws. In the Old Testament, there are many rules about what foods are clean or unclean, but this verse talks against restricting certain foods. This can seem inconsistent with earlier biblical teachings about dietary restrictions.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction is that the verse advises against abstaining from certain foods, which conflicts with scientific understanding that some people choose dietary restrictions for health reasons, like allergies or intolerances, which require them to avoid specific foods for their well-being.
Paradox #5
1 Timothy 4:3 could be seen as conflicting with other parts of the Bible that have dietary laws or restrictions. In the Old Testament, certain foods are prohibited in Jewish law, while this verse suggests that all foods are to be received with gratitude. Thus, the inconsistency arises between adhering to old dietary laws and embracing the teaching to accept all foods.